Craig Lloyd v Richard Hayward & Anor
The claimant's procedural inactivity did not amount to an abuse of process because there was no sufficient evidence of a lack of intention to prosecute the claim, the delay was partly attributable to the court's failure to list a CCMC, and both parties were inactive. Even if there had been abuse, striking out would not be a just or proportionate response in all the circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Craig Lloyd; First Defendant: Richard Hayward; Second Defendant: Sirocco Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Business/property / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Claim for Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Application to strike out refused
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Strike Out Applications, Delay in Litigation, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craig Lloyd
Claimant
Richard Hayward
First Defendant
Sirocco Holdings Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Business/property / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Claim for Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's conduct amounted to an abuse of process by 'warehousing' the claim or lacking genuine intention to prosecute it to trial
- 2 If so, whether the appropriate sanction is to strike out the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's procedural inactivity did not amount to an abuse of process because there was no sufficient evidence of a lack of intention to prosecute the claim, the delay was partly attributable to the court's failure to list a CCMC, and both parties were inactive. Even if there had been abuse, striking out would not be a just or proportionate response in all the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out refused
Orders
- Costs and case management conference to be re-listed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment