Senel Ahmet v David Tatum & Anor

Senel Ahmet v David Tatum & Anor

The claim is struck out as an abuse of process because Parliament has provided a comprehensive statutory scheme under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for resolving disputes over beneficial interests in property subject to restraint and confiscation orders, and such disputes must be determined in the Crown Court, not by parallel proceedings in the Chancery Division.

Parties
Claimant: Senel Ahmet; First Defendant: David Tatum; Second Defendant: The Crown Prosecution Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil (property, Trusts and Probate) / Application to Strike Out Claim
Outcome
Claim struck out as abuse of process
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Confiscation Proceedings, Beneficial Interest, Jurisdiction, Forum Shopping
Criminal Law Property Law Trusts Law Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Confiscation Proceedings Beneficial Interest Jurisdiction +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Senel Ahmet

Claimant

David Tatum

First Defendant

The Crown Prosecution Service

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (property, Trusts and Probate) / Application to Strike Out Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine beneficial interests in property subject to restraint and confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's civil proceedings constitute an abuse of process given the statutory scheme under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Ratio Decidendi

The claim is struck out as an abuse of process because Parliament has provided a comprehensive statutory scheme under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for resolving disputes over beneficial interests in property subject to restraint and confiscation orders, and such disputes must be determined in the Crown Court, not by parallel proceedings in the Chancery Division.

Court Disposition

Claim struck out as abuse of process

Orders

  • The claim is struck out.