J Preston & Sons Ltd

J Preston & Sons Ltd

There was no abuse of process that rendered a fair trial impossible. The clear and unchallenged medical diagnosis of asbestosis and causation of lung cancer meant that the alleged failures by the claimant's solicitor did not prejudice the appellant's ability to defend the claim. The threshold for striking out was not met, and the Master was correct to refuse the application.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: J Preston & Sons Ltd; Respondent/claimant: Julie Hurst (Personal Representative of the Estate of Gordon Anderson, Deceased)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Strike Out Applications, Asbestos Related Disease Claims, Fair Trial Rights
Tort Law Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Strike Out Applications Asbestos Related Disease Claims Fair Trial Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J Preston & Sons Ltd

Appellant/defendant

Julie Hurst (Personal Representative of the Estate of Gordon Anderson, Deceased)

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of the claimant's solicitor amounted to an abuse of process justifying strike out of the claim
  2. 2 Whether there was a substantial risk that a fair trial was no longer possible due to alleged failures in evidence preservation and disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

There was no abuse of process that rendered a fair trial impossible. The clear and unchallenged medical diagnosis of asbestosis and causation of lung cancer meant that the alleged failures by the claimant's solicitor did not prejudice the appellant's ability to defend the claim. The threshold for striking out was not met, and the Master was correct to refuse the application.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Strike out application remains refused