Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International & Ors (No. 13: Application by Privinvest Companies for Permission to Appeal) [2024] EWHC 3188 (Comm) (10 December 2024)
Permission to appeal refused as none of the six proposed grounds had real prospect of success; disclosure failings addressed by adverse inferences and calibrated response; Mozambican law imposes civil liability for bribery regardless of criminal liability; limitation period not expired as bribery was discovered in 2018; Mozambique acted reasonably in mitigation and settlements; Mozambique did not benefit from assets/services under Supply Contracts.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3188 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General); Defendants: Credit Suisse International and Others; Defendants: Privinvest Companies (Sixth to Tenth Defendants)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Trial and Post Trial Application / Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Enforcement
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused; stay of enforcement granted conditionally
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Disclosure Obligations, Civil Liability, Bribery, Corruption, Causation, Limitation, Quantum, Mitigation, Mozambican Law, Stay of Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General)
Claimant
Credit Suisse International and Others
Defendants
Privinvest Companies (Sixth to Tenth Defendants)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Trial and Post Trial Application / Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Enforcement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mozambique's disclosure failings warranted striking out its case
- 2 Whether Mozambican law imposes civil liability for bribery by legal persons
- 3 Whether limitation period bars Mozambique's claims
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal refused as none of the six proposed grounds had real prospect of success; disclosure failings addressed by adverse inferences and calibrated response; Mozambican law imposes civil liability for bribery regardless of criminal liability; limitation period not expired as bribery was discovered in 2018; Mozambique acted reasonably in mitigation and settlements; Mozambique did not benefit from assets/services under Supply Contracts.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused; stay of enforcement granted conditionally
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Stay of enforcement pending determination of application to Court of Appeal for permission to appeal, conditional on payment of £20 million on account of costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment