Daniels v Thompson
Mrs Daniels did not suffer actionable loss in her lifetime as a result of the solicitor's negligent inheritance tax advice, as the liability to inheritance tax only arose on her death and was suffered by her estate. Therefore, any cause of action in tort did not accrue to her and could not survive for the benefit of her estate. The claim is statute-barred, and the application to amend the claim to plead a duty to the personal representative is refused as having no real prospect of success.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Daniel Richard Daniels (Executor of Enid Daniels, deceased); Respondent/defendant: Thompson (formerly of Woodcock and Thompson)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (professional Negligence) / Appeal From Walsall County Court on Preliminary Limitation Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Application for permission to amend particulars of claim refused.
- Legal Topics
- Accrual of Cause of Action in Tort, Limitation Period for Negligence, Duty of Care of Solicitors, Inheritance Tax Planning, Personal Representatives' Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Richard Daniels (Executor of Enid Daniels, deceased)
Appellant/claimant
Thompson (formerly of Woodcock and Thompson)
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (professional Negligence) / Appeal From Walsall County Court on Preliminary Limitation Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 When does a cause of action in tort for negligent inheritance tax advice accrue?
- 2 Did Mrs Daniels or her estate suffer actionable loss prior to her death?
- 3 Can the personal representative claim for loss to the estate due to negligent advice?
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Daniels did not suffer actionable loss in her lifetime as a result of the solicitor's negligent inheritance tax advice, as the liability to inheritance tax only arose on her death and was suffered by her estate. Therefore, any cause of action in tort did not accrue to her and could not survive for the benefit of her estate. The claim is statute-barred, and the application to amend the claim to plead a duty to the personal representative is refused as having no real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Application for permission to amend particulars of claim refused.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Permission to amend particulars of claim to plead duty to personal representative refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment