Ross v McGrath

Ross v McGrath

The letter of 1 May 1996, when read as a whole and in its context, constituted an acknowledgment of the specific debts claimed by the respondent, thereby extending the limitation period under section 29(5) of the Limitation Act 1980. The only reservation was as to the amount, not the existence, of the debts.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: David Ross; Defendant/appellant: Francis Joseph McGrath
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issue Determination
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Acknowledgment of Debt, Limitation Periods, Interpretation of Written Communications
Limitation of Actions Contract Law Acknowledgment of Debt Limitation Periods Interpretation of Written Communications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Ross

Claimant/respondent

Francis Joseph McGrath

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issue Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the letter dated 1 May 1996 constituted an acknowledgment of debt within the meaning of section 29(5) of the Limitation Act 1980
  2. 2 Whether the acknowledgment extended the limitation period for the respondent's claims

Ratio Decidendi

The letter of 1 May 1996, when read as a whole and in its context, constituted an acknowledgment of the specific debts claimed by the respondent, thereby extending the limitation period under section 29(5) of the Limitation Act 1980. The only reservation was as to the amount, not the existence, of the debts.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appellant to pay respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £7,168.68 by 4.00 pm on 16 August 2004