Hamid-Zadeh v Revens & Ors [2003] EWCA Civ 778 (02 June 2003)

Hamid-Zadeh v Revens & Ors [2003] EWCA Civ 778 (02 June 2003)

Application for adjournment refused as it was too late and applicant had ample time to prepare; procedural delays and transcript issues did not justify further adjournment.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 778
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Mahnez Hamid-Zadeh; Defendant/respondent: Neil Revens; Defendant/respondent: Jim McKenzie; Defendant/respondent: Sharon Drew Morgan; Defendant/respondent: Maureen Judith Conway
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Adjournment of Permission to Appeal Hearing
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Eviction, Appeal, Summary Judgment, Costs
Civil Procedure Landlord and Tenant Adjournment Eviction Appeal Summary Judgment Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mahnez Hamid-Zadeh

Claimant/applicant

Neil Revens

Defendant/respondent

Jim McKenzie

Defendant/respondent

Sharon Drew Morgan

Defendant/respondent

Maureen Judith Conway

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Adjournment of Permission to Appeal Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for adjournment of the permission to appeal hearing should be granted
  2. 2 Whether procedural fairness was denied in previous hearings
  3. 3 Whether summary assessment of costs was proper

Ratio Decidendi

Application for adjournment refused as it was too late and applicant had ample time to prepare; procedural delays and transcript issues did not justify further adjournment.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • Matter to remain listed for hearing next Thursday
  • No order for three-judge court