Corbett v South Yorkshire Strategic Health Authority
The decision to refuse an adjournment was a proper exercise of case management discretion; the issues were not identical to Thompstone, and it is beneficial for the appellate court to have a range of first instance decisions. There was no basis for appellate interference.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: John Corbett (by his mother and litigation friend Catherine Elizabeth Corbett); Defendant/appellant: South Yorkshire Strategic Health Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Adjourn Trial (case Management Decision)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Case Management, Damages, Periodical Payments, Indexation of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Corbett (by his mother and litigation friend Catherine Elizabeth Corbett)
Claimant/respondent
South Yorkshire Strategic Health Authority
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Adjourn Trial (case Management Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial of the indexation issue should be adjourned pending the outcome of the Thompstone appeal
- 2 Whether the case management decision to proceed with the trial was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The decision to refuse an adjournment was a proper exercise of case management discretion; the issues were not identical to Thompstone, and it is beneficial for the appellate court to have a range of first instance decisions. There was no basis for appellate interference.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; trial to proceed as scheduled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment