Salamony v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd

Salamony v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd

The judge was entitled and obliged to refuse the adjournment and strike out the claim due to unexplained delay, lack of action to restore BIM, dubious evidence, and inconsistency in the claimant's case. Indemnity costs were justified by the claimant's unreasonable conduct and hopeless claim.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Dr Mohsen Salamony; Defendant/respondent: Balfour Beatty Construction Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Striking Out, Indemnity Costs, Oral Contracts, Assignment of Contract
Civil Procedure Contract Law Adjournment Striking Out Indemnity Costs Oral Contracts Assignment of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Mohsen Salamony

Claimant/appellant

Balfour Beatty Construction Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing an adjournment and striking out the action
  2. 2 Whether indemnity costs were properly awarded against the claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled and obliged to refuse the adjournment and strike out the claim due to unexplained delay, lack of action to restore BIM, dubious evidence, and inconsistency in the claimant's case. Indemnity costs were justified by the claimant's unreasonable conduct and hopeless claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Claimant to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis