Knight v Sage Group Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 488 (23 March 2001)
Both applications for permission to appeal were refused because neither enjoyed any realistic prospect of success; the judges below acted within their discretion, there was no breach of the applicant's right to a fair trial, and the withdrawal of legal aid was lawful and inevitable given the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 488
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Miriam Knight; Defendant/respondent: The Sage Group PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Applications for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Applications for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Trial, Striking Out of Claim, Legal Aid Withdrawal, Disclosure of Medical Evidence, Right to Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miriam Knight
Claimant/applicant
The Sage Group PLC
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Applications for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to adjourn the trial date in the contract claim was proper
- 2 Whether the striking out of the personal injury claim for non-compliance with court orders was justified
- 3 Whether withdrawal of legal aid was lawful and justified
Ratio Decidendi
Both applications for permission to appeal were refused because neither enjoyed any realistic prospect of success; the judges below acted within their discretion, there was no breach of the applicant's right to a fair trial, and the withdrawal of legal aid was lawful and inevitable given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Applications for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal in contract claim refused
- Permission to appeal in personal injury claim refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment