Brampton v Rust & Anor [2008] EWHC 216 (QB) (06 February 2008)
The application to adjourn was made late and not diligently, but given the unusual circumstances, including the defendants' recent criminal proceedings and lack of trial readiness, it would be unduly harsh to refuse the adjournment. The adjournment is granted on condition that the defendants pay the claimant's costs of the adjournment.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 216 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Brampton; First Defendant: Rust; Second Defendant: Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Adjournment of Trial
- Outcome
- Application to adjourn granted
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Trial, Freezing Injunction, Preparation for Trial, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brampton
Claimant
Rust
First Defendant
Another
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Adjournment of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' application to adjourn the trial should be granted due to alleged inability to prepare caused by a freezing order and asset restrictions
Ratio Decidendi
The application to adjourn was made late and not diligently, but given the unusual circumstances, including the defendants' recent criminal proceedings and lack of trial readiness, it would be unduly harsh to refuse the adjournment. The adjournment is granted on condition that the defendants pay the claimant's costs of the adjournment.
Court Disposition
Application to adjourn granted
Orders
- Trial adjourned to a window commencing 14th April 2008
- Defendants to pay claimant's costs of the adjournment, summarily assessed and payable in short order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment