JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Kolomoisky & Ors [2022] EWHC 775 (Ch) (01 April 2022)
The court found that the ongoing war in Ukraine has created grave and insuperable difficulties for the defendants in preparing for and participating in the trial, including inability to communicate with legal teams, access documents, or secure expert evidence. The evidence established that these difficulties could not be mitigated or resolved by adaptations. Proceeding with the trial as scheduled would be unfair to the defendants and would not meet the requirements of a fair trial. The prejudice to the claimant and the state of Ukraine, while significant, did not outweigh the fundamental unfairness to the defendants. Therefore, the trial must be adjourned.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 775 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: JSC Commercial Bank PrivatBank; First Defendant: Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky; Second Defendant: Gennadiy Borisovich Bogolyubov; Third Defendant: Teamtrend Limited; Fourth Defendant: Trade Point Agro Limited; Fifth Defendant: Collyer Limited; Sixth Defendant: Rossyn Investing Corp; Seventh Defendant: Milbert Ventures Inc; Eighth Defendant: ZAO Ukrtransitservice Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Fraud Claim / Pre Trial Review; Application for Adjournment of Trial
- Outcome
- Trial adjourned to a date to be fixed in the first half of June 2023.
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Trial, Fair Trial Rights, Impact of War on Litigation, Fraud, Jurisdiction, Disclosure, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC Commercial Bank PrivatBank
Claimant
Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky
First Defendant
Gennadiy Borisovich Bogolyubov
Second Defendant
Teamtrend Limited
Third Defendant
Trade Point Agro Limited
Fourth Defendant
Collyer Limited
Fifth Defendant
Rossyn Investing Corp
Sixth Defendant
Milbert Ventures Inc
Seventh Defendant
ZAO Ukrtransitservice Ltd
Eighth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Fraud Claim / Pre Trial Review; Application for Adjournment of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial should be adjourned due to the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the defendants' ability to prepare and participate
- 2 Whether a fair trial could proceed as scheduled in June 2022
- 3 Whether the prejudice to the claimant and the state of Ukraine outweighs the prejudice to the defendants if the trial is adjourned
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ongoing war in Ukraine has created grave and insuperable difficulties for the defendants in preparing for and participating in the trial, including inability to communicate with legal teams, access documents, or secure expert evidence. The evidence established that these difficulties could not be mitigated or resolved by adaptations. Proceeding with the trial as scheduled would be unfair to the defendants and would not meet the requirements of a fair trial. The prejudice to the claimant and the state of Ukraine, while significant, did not outweigh the fundamental unfairness to the defendants. Therefore, the trial must be adjourned.
Court Disposition
Trial adjourned to a date to be fixed in the first half of June 2023.
Orders
- The trial listed to commence on 7 June 2022 is adjourned.
- A new trial date is to be fixed for the first half of June 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment