LJR Interiors Limited v Cooper Construction Limited

LJR Interiors Limited v Cooper Construction Limited

The adjudicator erred in law by disregarding the limitation defence available to Cooper Construction Limited. The sums claimed by LJR Interiors Limited under Application No. 4 were statute barred, as the cause of action accrued in 2014 and no valid acknowledgment revived the limitation period. The limitation defence is substantive and applies to adjudication proceedings. The adjudicator's decision is therefore unenforceable.

Parties
Claimant (part 7), Defendant (part 8): LJR Interiors Limited; Defendant (part 7), Claimant (part 8): Cooper Construction Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction/commercial) / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application (part 7) and Declaratory Relief (part 8)
Outcome
Part 7 Claim dismissed; Part 8 Claim allowed; declaratory relief granted that the adjudicator's decision is unenforceable as statute barred.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Limitation of Actions, Summary Judgment, Declaratory Relief, Payment Disputes, Retention Under Construction Contracts
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Limitation of Actions Summary Judgment Declaratory Relief Payment Disputes +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LJR Interiors Limited

Claimant (part 7), Defendant (part 8)

Cooper Construction Limited

Defendant (part 7), Claimant (part 8)

Procedural Posture

Civil (construction/commercial) / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application (part 7) and Declaratory Relief (part 8)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision in favour of LJR Interiors Limited is enforceable or statute barred under the Limitation Act 1980
  2. 2 Whether the limitation period applies to adjudication proceedings under a construction contract
  3. 3 Whether an email from Cooper Construction Limited in December 2016 constituted an acknowledgment sufficient to revive the limitation period under section 29 of the Limitation Act 1980

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator erred in law by disregarding the limitation defence available to Cooper Construction Limited. The sums claimed by LJR Interiors Limited under Application No. 4 were statute barred, as the cause of action accrued in 2014 and no valid acknowledgment revived the limitation period. The limitation defence is substantive and applies to adjudication proceedings. The adjudicator's decision is therefore unenforceable.

Court Disposition

Part 7 Claim dismissed; Part 8 Claim allowed; declaratory relief granted that the adjudicator's decision is unenforceable as statute barred.

Orders

  • Summary judgment application by LJR Interiors Limited dismissed.
  • Declaration granted that Application No. 4 is statute barred and the adjudicator's decision is unenforceable.