Bellway Homes Ltd v Surgo Construction Ltd

Bellway Homes Ltd v Surgo Construction Ltd

The adjudicator was validly appointed under the contract, which did not contravene the HGCRA; the appointment process did not create a perception of bias, and the timetable was compliant. The contract (especially clause 4.9A) entitled Bellway to recover overpayments at interim stage, and general law also supports such recovery. Surgo is not entitled to the declarations sought, and Bellway is entitled to enforcement of the adjudicator's decision.

Parties
Claimant (part 7) / Defendant (part 8): Bellway Homes Limited; Defendant (part 7) / Claimant (part 8): Surgo Construction Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Judgment After Summary Enforcement and Declaratory Relief Applications
Outcome
Judgment for Bellway; Surgo's declaratory relief refused
Legal Topics
Adjudication Under Construction Contracts, Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision, Interim Payments, Restitution, Contractual Interpretation
Construction Law Contract Law Adjudication Under Construction Contracts Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision Interim Payments Restitution Contractual Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bellway Homes Limited

Claimant (part 7) / Defendant (part 8)

Surgo Construction Limited

Defendant (part 7) / Claimant (part 8)

Procedural Posture

Civil (construction Contract Dispute) / Judgment After Summary Enforcement and Declaratory Relief Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator was validly appointed under the contract and the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA)
  2. 2 Whether the contractual adjudication provisions contravened the HGCRA
  3. 3 Whether the employer (Bellway) is entitled to repayment of overpayments at interim stage under the contract or general law

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator was validly appointed under the contract, which did not contravene the HGCRA; the appointment process did not create a perception of bias, and the timetable was compliant. The contract (especially clause 4.9A) entitled Bellway to recover overpayments at interim stage, and general law also supports such recovery. Surgo is not entitled to the declarations sought, and Bellway is entitled to enforcement of the adjudicator's decision.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Bellway; Surgo's declaratory relief refused

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted to Bellway for the sum decided by the adjudicator (£1,076,220.82)
  • Surgo's Part 8 claim for declarations refused