Pegram Shopfitters Ltd. v Tally Weijl (UK) Ltd.

Pegram Shopfitters Ltd. v Tally Weijl (UK) Ltd.

The appeal was allowed because the defendants had a properly arguable case that there was no written construction contract within the meaning of the 1996 Act, so the adjudicator may have lacked jurisdiction. Summary judgment enforcing the adjudicator's decision was therefore inappropriate.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Pegram Shopfitters Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Tally Weijl (UK) Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in Enforcement Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Adjudication Under Construction Contracts, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Summary Judgment, Existence of Written Contract, Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Under Construction Contracts Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Summary Judgment Existence of Written Contract Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pegram Shopfitters Ltd

Claimant/respondent

Tally Weijl (UK) Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in Enforcement Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a construction contract in writing within the meaning of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to determine the dispute
  3. 3 Whether summary judgment enforcing the adjudicator's decision was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the defendants had a properly arguable case that there was no written construction contract within the meaning of the 1996 Act, so the adjudicator may have lacked jurisdiction. Summary judgment enforcing the adjudicator's decision was therefore inappropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judge's order for summary judgment set aside