Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd & Ors v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch) (28 March 2012)
Where rent is payable in advance and falls due before the commencement of administration, it is provable but not payable as an administration expense, even if the administrators retain the property for the period covered by the rent. Only rent falling due after commencement and during retention is payable as an expense.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicants/claimants: Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd & Ors; Respondents/defendants: Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Administration Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing of Applications for Permission to Forfeit Leases and for Payment of Pre Administration Rent as an Expense
- Outcome
- Application for payment of pre-administration rent as an expense dismissed; landlords awarded costs of the application for permission to forfeit.
- Legal Topics
- Administration Expenses, Forfeiture of Lease, Rent Payable in Advance, Priority of Payments in Insolvency, Assignment of Leases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd & Ors
Applicants/claimants
Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) & Ors
Respondents/defendants
Procedural Posture
Application in Administration Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing of Applications for Permission to Forfeit Leases and for Payment of Pre Administration Rent as an Expense
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rent payable in advance and due before commencement of administration is payable as an administration expense
- 2 Whether landlords are entitled to payment of pre-administration rent as an expense where administrators retain possession
- 3 Whether landlords are entitled to costs of the application for permission to forfeit
Ratio Decidendi
Where rent is payable in advance and falls due before the commencement of administration, it is provable but not payable as an administration expense, even if the administrators retain the property for the period covered by the rent. Only rent falling due after commencement and during retention is payable as an expense.
Court Disposition
Application for payment of pre-administration rent as an expense dismissed; landlords awarded costs of the application for permission to forfeit.
Orders
- Administrators not required to pay pre-administration rent as an expense.
- Administrators to pay landlords' costs of the application for permission to forfeit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment