In the matter of: Bulb Energy Limited (In energy supply company administration)
The administrators’ remuneration and pre-appointment costs were properly incurred, fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the work undertaken, as confirmed by an independent assessor and the principal economic stakeholder (BEIS). The sums are approved in accordance with the statutory and regulatory framework for special energy administration.
- Parties
- Company: Bulb Energy Limited (in Energy Supply Company Administration); Energy Administrators / Applicants: Mr Matthew Cowlishaw, Mr Matthew Smith, Mr Daniel Butters (Teneo Financial Advisory Limited); Interested Party / Funder: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS); Secured Creditor: Sequoia
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency (special Energy Administration) / Application for Approval of Administrators’ Remuneration and Pre Appointment Costs
- Outcome
- Applications granted; administrators’ remuneration and pre-appointment costs approved.
- Legal Topics
- Administrators’ Remuneration, Pre Appointment Costs, Special Administration Regime, Court Approval of Fees, Stakeholder Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bulb Energy Limited (in Energy Supply Company Administration)
Company
Mr Matthew Cowlishaw, Mr Matthew Smith, Mr Daniel Butters (Teneo Financial Advisory Limited)
Energy Administrators / Applicants
Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
Interested Party / Funder
Sequoia
Secured Creditor
Procedural Posture
Insolvency (special Energy Administration) / Application for Approval of Administrators’ Remuneration and Pre Appointment Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrators’ remuneration and pre-appointment costs are fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the work undertaken
- 2 Whether the sums sought have been properly scrutinised and justified under the special energy administration regime
Ratio Decidendi
The administrators’ remuneration and pre-appointment costs were properly incurred, fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the work undertaken, as confirmed by an independent assessor and the principal economic stakeholder (BEIS). The sums are approved in accordance with the statutory and regulatory framework for special energy administration.
Court Disposition
Applications granted; administrators’ remuneration and pre-appointment costs approved.
Orders
- Administrators’ remuneration approved in the sum of £24,969,221 plus VAT.
- Pre-appointment costs approved in the sum of £3,181,920.67 plus VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment