Neal v Jones (t/a Jones Motors) [2002] EWCA Civ 604 (19 April 2002)
Permission granted to admit certain further evidence subject to conditions; specific paragraphs of witness statements and comparable evidence about damages excluded; case to be re-listed for further hearing.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 604
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Matthew Russell Neal; Defendant/appellant: Alison Jones (Trading as Jones Motors)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Rely on Further Evidence and to Amend Appellant's Notices
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Admission of Further Evidence, Amendment of Pleadings, Personal Injury, Mediation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matthew Russell Neal
Claimant/respondent
Alison Jones (Trading as Jones Motors)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Rely on Further Evidence and to Amend Appellant's Notices
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to permit reliance on further evidence on appeal
- 2 Whether to permit amendment of appellant's notices
Ratio Decidendi
Permission granted to admit certain further evidence subject to conditions; specific paragraphs of witness statements and comparable evidence about damages excluded; case to be re-listed for further hearing.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Evidence admitted subject to Miss Tedstone appearing for questioning.
- Evidence of Mr Neal admitted; permission for further statement in response by 10th May.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment