AW (A Child: Application to Revoke Placement Order: Leave to Oppose Adoption) [2013] EWHC 2967 (Fam) (16 August 2013)
The parents failed to demonstrate a sufficient change of circumstances since the placement order was made. Their concealment of the mother's pregnancy and lack of sustained engagement with therapeutic and support services evidenced no real change in their ability to work openly and honestly with professionals. The welfare of AW, who had settled with her prospective adopters, required stability and permanence, and exposing her to further disruption would risk significant harm. Leave to oppose the adoption was refused.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 2967 (Fam)
- Parties
- Mother: NT; Father: AA; Local Authority: London Borough of Croydon; Prospective Adopters/intervenors: Mr and Mrs A; Children's Guardian: Barbara Newton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Application to Revoke Placement Order and for Leave to Oppose Adoption
- Outcome
- Application for leave to oppose adoption refused; placement order not revoked.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Placement Orders, Leave to Oppose Adoption, Change of Circumstances, Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NT
Mother
AA
Father
London Borough of Croydon
Local Authority
Mr and Mrs A
Prospective Adopters/intervenors
Barbara Newton
Children's Guardian
Procedural Posture
Family / Application to Revoke Placement Order and for Leave to Oppose Adoption
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a sufficient change of circumstances since the placement order to justify revocation or to grant leave to oppose adoption
- 2 Whether the welfare of the child requires granting leave to oppose adoption
Ratio Decidendi
The parents failed to demonstrate a sufficient change of circumstances since the placement order was made. Their concealment of the mother's pregnancy and lack of sustained engagement with therapeutic and support services evidenced no real change in their ability to work openly and honestly with professionals. The welfare of AW, who had settled with her prospective adopters, required stability and permanence, and exposing her to further disruption would risk significant harm. Leave to oppose the adoption was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to oppose adoption refused; placement order not revoked.
Orders
- Leave to oppose the adoption of AW is refused.
- AW to remain with Mr and Mrs A as her prospective adopters.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment