X & Anor v A & Ors [2018] EWHC 3223 (Fam) (27 July 2018)
The welfare of C and D requires that they remain with Mr. and Mrs. X, who are their psychological and emotional parents. The birth parents are unable to meet the children's needs, and any lesser order would not provide the necessary permanence and security. The children's welfare requires dispensing with parental consent to adoption. An injunction is necessary to protect the children and adopters from potential harm by the birth parents.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3223 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicants: Mr. and Mrs. X; 1st Respondent (mother): Ms. A; 2nd Respondent (father): Mr. B; 3rd and 4th Respondents (children): C and D (by their Guardian, Billie McKay); 5th Respondent (adoption Agency): The City of Edinburgh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption orders granted in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X for children C and D; parental consent dispensed with; injunction granted against the birth parents.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Parental Consent, Welfare of the Child, Dispensing With Parental Consent, Injunctions, Care Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. and Mrs. X
Applicants
Ms. A
1st Respondent (mother)
Mr. B
2nd Respondent (father)
C and D (by their Guardian, Billie McKay)
3rd and 4th Respondents (children)
The City of Edinburgh
5th Respondent (adoption Agency)
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adoption orders should be made in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X for children C and D
- 2 Whether the consent of the birth parents should be dispensed with under section 52 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002
- 3 Whether a lesser order (e.g., special guardianship or child arrangements order) would suffice for the welfare of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The welfare of C and D requires that they remain with Mr. and Mrs. X, who are their psychological and emotional parents. The birth parents are unable to meet the children's needs, and any lesser order would not provide the necessary permanence and security. The children's welfare requires dispensing with parental consent to adoption. An injunction is necessary to protect the children and adopters from potential harm by the birth parents.
Court Disposition
Adoption orders granted in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X for children C and D; parental consent dispensed with; injunction granted against the birth parents.
Orders
- Adoption orders made for C and D in favour of Mr. and Mrs. X.
- Consent of the mother and father to adoption dispensed with under section 52 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment