A (A Child), Re (Contested Adoption and Local Authority Conduct) (Rev1) [2024] EWFC 192 (B) (11 July 2024)
The court found that the local authority's assessments and decision-making were fundamentally flawed, failing to properly weigh the welfare implications for A of removing her from her primary attachment figures (Mr and Ms X) and not adequately considering the statutory welfare checklist. The evidence established that A's welfare throughout her life required her to remain with Mr and Ms X, who have been her primary carers since birth and to whom she is securely attached. Severing these attachments would cause significant harm, and the threshold for non-consensual adoption was met. The court determined that nothing else would do to meet A's welfare needs but to grant the Adoption Order to...
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 192 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant (placement Order Discharge): LB Lewisham; Mother: Ms R; Father: Mr Q; Adoption Applicants / Foster Carers: Mr and Ms X; Intervenor Local Authority: Z Council; Subject Child: A (the child)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Adoption / Care Proceedings / Final Judgment on Contested Adoption and Placement Order Discharge
- Outcome
- Adoption Order granted to Mr and Ms X; Placement Order and Care Order discharged; contact order made for ongoing contact with birth family.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Care Orders, Placement Orders, Welfare of the Child, Parental Consent, Contact Orders, Local Authority Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LB Lewisham
Applicant (placement Order Discharge)
Ms R
Mother
Mr Q
Father
Mr and Ms X
Adoption Applicants / Foster Carers
Z Council
Intervenor Local Authority
A (the child)
Subject Child
Procedural Posture
Family / Adoption / Care Proceedings / Final Judgment on Contested Adoption and Placement Order Discharge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to revoke the Placement Order for A
- 2 Whether to grant an Adoption Order to Mr and Ms X
- 3 Whether to dispense with parental consent for adoption
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the local authority's assessments and decision-making were fundamentally flawed, failing to properly weigh the welfare implications for A of removing her from her primary attachment figures (Mr and Ms X) and not adequately considering the statutory welfare checklist. The evidence established that A's welfare throughout her life required her to remain with Mr and Ms X, who have been her primary carers since birth and to whom she is securely attached. Severing these attachments would cause significant harm, and the threshold for non-consensual adoption was met. The court determined that nothing else would do to meet A's welfare needs but to grant the Adoption Order to...
Court Disposition
Adoption Order granted to Mr and Ms X; Placement Order and Care Order discharged; contact order made for ongoing contact with birth family.
Orders
- Adoption Order in favour of Mr and Ms X for A
- Placement Order discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment