A & Anor. v B & Anor.
The court found that B's welfare required the making of an adoption order, that the mother lacked capacity to consent, and that her consent could be dispensed with under section 52 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. The adoption was overwhelmingly in B's best interests, providing her with security, stability, and a family unit, and further delay would risk significant harm to her welfare.
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: A; 2nd Applicant: C; 1st Respondent (child, Through Guardian): B; Children’s Guardian: Helen Ashton; 2nd Respondent: A District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption (convention Adoption Order) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted; mother's consent dispensed with due to lack of capacity.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Hague Convention 1993, Parental Responsibility, Consent to Adoption, Mental Capacity, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
1st Applicant
C
2nd Applicant
B
1st Respondent (child, Through Guardian)
Helen Ashton
Children’s Guardian
A District Council
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption (convention Adoption Order) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a Convention Adoption Order for B under the 1993 Hague Convention and UK law
- 2 Whether the mother has parental responsibility and if her consent is required or can be dispensed with
- 3 Whether the welfare of B requires the making of an adoption order
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that B's welfare required the making of an adoption order, that the mother lacked capacity to consent, and that her consent could be dispensed with under section 52 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. The adoption was overwhelmingly in B's best interests, providing her with security, stability, and a family unit, and further delay would risk significant harm to her welfare.
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted; mother's consent dispensed with due to lack of capacity.
Orders
- Mother removed as a party to proceedings under Rule 14.3(3)(b) FPR 2010
- Adoption order made in favour of the applicants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment