MJC (refusal of permission to oppose adoption) [2015] EWFC B75 (23 June 2015)
There has not been a change of circumstances of a nature and degree sufficient to reopen consideration of the adoption order. The parents' move to independent accommodation and the father's continued stability are managed only through increased supervision, and the core risks identified in the original proceedings remain. The parents and grandmother continue to lack insight into the risks posed by the father's mental health. Even if there had been a change, the parents have no realistic prospect of successfully opposing the adoption order, as the child's welfare requires permanence and safety, which only adoption can provide in this case.
- Citation
- [2015] EWFC B75
- Parties
- Mother: RW; Father: MC; Child: MJC; Local Authority: London Borough of Barking and Dagenham; Applicants for Adoption Order: Prospective adopters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family/adoption / Application for Permission to Oppose Adoption Order
- Outcome
- Permission to oppose adoption order refused; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Order, Permission to Oppose Adoption, Change of Circumstances, Child Welfare, Mental Health and Parenting, Care and Placement Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RW
Mother
MC
Father
MJC
Child
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
Local Authority
Prospective adopters
Applicants for Adoption Order
Procedural Posture
Family/adoption / Application for Permission to Oppose Adoption Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a change of circumstances since the placement order sufficient to grant permission to oppose the adoption order under s.47(7) Adoption and Children Act 2002
- 2 Whether, if such change exists, leave to oppose should be granted considering the child's welfare throughout her life
Ratio Decidendi
There has not been a change of circumstances of a nature and degree sufficient to reopen consideration of the adoption order. The parents' move to independent accommodation and the father's continued stability are managed only through increased supervision, and the core risks identified in the original proceedings remain. The parents and grandmother continue to lack insight into the risks posed by the father's mental health. Even if there had been a change, the parents have no realistic prospect of successfully opposing the adoption order, as the child's welfare requires permanence and safety, which only adoption can provide in this case.
Court Disposition
Permission to oppose adoption order refused; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application for permission to oppose adoption order is dismissed.
- Application for permission to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment