Sempra Metals Ltd v Inland Revenue & Anor
Community law requires that compensation for the loss of use of money due to premature payment of advance corporation tax must be calculated on a compound interest basis, as only this provides full restitution. Domestic law restrictions on awarding compound interest do not apply where they would undermine the effectiveness of the Community law remedy.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited); Defendant/appellant: Commissioners of Inland Revenue; Defendant/appellant: Her Majesty’s Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed save for variation
- Legal Topics
- Advance Corporation Tax, Compound Interest, Damages for Breach of EU Law, Restitution for Premature Tax Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited)
Claimant/respondent
Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Defendant/appellant
Her Majesty’s Attorney General
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation for loss of use of money due to premature payment of advance corporation tax in breach of Community law should be calculated on a compound or simple interest basis.
- 2 Whether domestic law restrictions on awarding compound interest apply where Community law requires full compensation.
Ratio Decidendi
Community law requires that compensation for the loss of use of money due to premature payment of advance corporation tax must be calculated on a compound interest basis, as only this provides full restitution. Domestic law restrictions on awarding compound interest do not apply where they would undermine the effectiveness of the Community law remedy.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed save for variation
Orders
- Paragraph 1 of the order of 16 June 2004 varied to clarify that interest over the premature tax period should be computed by compounding at the same periodic rests as those by reference to which the applicable rate has been fixed.
- Otherwise, the appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment