Charity of Sir John Morden (Trustees of) v Mayrick [2007] EWCA Civ 4 (12 January 2007)

Charity of Sir John Morden (Trustees of) v Mayrick [2007] EWCA Civ 4 (12 January 2007)

The compromise agreement was enforceable as the College had sufficient possessory title to the land in question, and any representations made were not materially false or did not induce the agreement. Mr Mayrick was estopped from asserting adverse possession as he had admitted the College's title in prior proceedings and the compromise. Summary judgment was appropriate as there was no real prospect of Mr Mayrick succeeding at trial.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Civ 4
Parties
Claimants/respondents: The Trustees in the Charity of Sir John Morden; Defendant/appellant: Brian Mayrick
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Which Was Itself an Appeal From Summary Judgment in County Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for specific performance upheld.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Specific Performance, Compromise Agreements, Summary Judgment, Misrepresentation, Title to Land
Property Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Specific Performance Compromise Agreements Summary Judgment Misrepresentation +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Trustees in the Charity of Sir John Morden

Claimants/respondents

Brian Mayrick

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Which Was Itself an Appeal From Summary Judgment in County Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the compromise agreement for land transfer was enforceable given alleged misrepresentation and title issues
  2. 2 Whether the College had sufficient title to the land to require specific performance
  3. 3 Whether adverse possession by Hyde or Mayrick defeated the College's title

Ratio Decidendi

The compromise agreement was enforceable as the College had sufficient possessory title to the land in question, and any representations made were not materially false or did not induce the agreement. Mr Mayrick was estopped from asserting adverse possession as he had admitted the College's title in prior proceedings and the compromise. Summary judgment was appropriate as there was no real prospect of Mr Mayrick succeeding at trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for specific performance upheld.

Orders

  • Specific performance of the compromise agreement ordered against Mr Mayrick
  • Injunction restraining Mr Mayrick from occupying land other than as provided in the agreement