Chapman & Anor v Godinn Properties Ltd & Ors
The claimants demonstrated sufficient acts of factual possession and intention to possess the disputed strip, including construction and maintenance of entrances and walls, and tending the land. The judge was entitled to find adverse possession and order rectification of the register to remove the disputed strip from the defendant's title and register the claimants as proprietors with possessory title.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mark Chapman; Claimant/respondent: Fiona Rivers Chapman; First Defendant/appellant: Godinn Properties Limited; Second Defendant: David Robert Stirling; Third Defendant: Jackie Stirling
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Land Registration, Rectification of Title
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Chapman
Claimant/respondent
Fiona Rivers Chapman
Claimant/respondent
Godinn Properties Limited
First Defendant/appellant
David Robert Stirling
Second Defendant
Jackie Stirling
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants established adverse possession of the disputed strip of land
- 2 Whether the Land Registry title should be rectified to remove the disputed strip from the defendant's title and register the claimants as proprietors with possessory title
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants demonstrated sufficient acts of factual possession and intention to possess the disputed strip, including construction and maintenance of entrances and walls, and tending the land. The judge was entitled to find adverse possession and order rectification of the register to remove the disputed strip from the defendant's title and register the claimants as proprietors with possessory title.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs assessed summarily at £6,750 including VAT
- Matter remitted to the trial judge to consider the appropriate form of declaration under the Land Registration Act 2002
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment