Roberts v Swangrove Estates Ltd & Anor
Swangrove Estates Limited and its predecessors acquired title to Caerleon and the Welsh sliver by adverse possession, having exercised unbroken, obvious, and exclusive possession with the necessary animus possidendi for the statutory period. The Crown Estate Commissioners acquired title to Magor and the Eastern sliver by adverse possession, with sufficient acts of possession and animus possidendi. Swangrove's claim to Mathern fails for lack of sufficient acts of possession. The outcome as to the Porton Green Area (PGA) depends on whether the Third Defendant's several fishery includes the soil; if not, adverse possession is made out, but this must await determination of paper title in the...
- Parties
- Claimant: Mark Andrew Roberts (suing under the name of Mark Andrew Tudor, Lord Marcher of Trelleck); First Defendant: Swangrove Estates Limited; Second Defendant: Crown Estate Commissioners; Third Defendant: John Wardlaw Hanbury-Tenison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues (adverse Possession)
- Outcome
- Swangrove's claim to Mathern fails; its claims to Caerleon and the Welsh sliver succeed. The Crown Estate Commissioners' claims to Magor and the Eastern sliver succeed. The outcome as to the Porton Green Area (PGA) is reserved pending determination of paper title in the main action.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation Periods, Foreshore and Riverbed Ownership, Paper Title Vs Possession, Crown Rights, Exclusive Possession, Animus Possidendi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Andrew Roberts (suing under the name of Mark Andrew Tudor, Lord Marcher of Trelleck)
Claimant
Swangrove Estates Limited
First Defendant
Crown Estate Commissioners
Second Defendant
John Wardlaw Hanbury-Tenison
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues (adverse Possession)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants or their predecessors acquired title to disputed areas by adverse possession against the Claimant or his predecessors.
- 2 Whether acts of possession and animus possidendi were sufficiently proved for the relevant limitation period.
- 3 Whether the Crown can acquire title by adverse possession against a subject.
Ratio Decidendi
Swangrove Estates Limited and its predecessors acquired title to Caerleon and the Welsh sliver by adverse possession, having exercised unbroken, obvious, and exclusive possession with the necessary animus possidendi for the statutory period. The Crown Estate Commissioners acquired title to Magor and the Eastern sliver by adverse possession, with sufficient acts of possession and animus possidendi. Swangrove's claim to Mathern fails for lack of sufficient acts of possession. The outcome as to the Porton Green Area (PGA) depends on whether the Third Defendant's several fishery includes the soil; if not, adverse possession is made out, but this must await determination of paper title in the...
Court Disposition
Swangrove's claim to Mathern fails; its claims to Caerleon and the Welsh sliver succeed. The Crown Estate Commissioners' claims to Magor and the Eastern sliver succeed. The outcome as to the Porton Green Area (PGA) is reserved pending determination of paper title in the main action.
Orders
- Swangrove Estates Limited declared to have acquired title by adverse possession to Caerleon and the Welsh sliver.
- Crown Estate Commissioners declared to have acquired title by adverse possession to Magor and the Eastern sliver.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment