Cam Askan v Trustees of St Asaph Conservative Club

Cam Askan v Trustees of St Asaph Conservative Club

The Club holds registered title and/or adverse possession over the contested land; the Club has a prescriptive easement over the path; Applicant's claims for harassment, nuisance, and breach of Data Protection Act fail due to lack of ownership and reasonable conduct by the Club; allegations of bias and procedural irregularity are unfounded.

Parties
Claimant/applicant: Cam Askan; Defendant/respondent: Trustees of St Asaph Conservative Club
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Oral Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Easements, Trespass, Harassment, Data Protection, Nuisance, Case Management, Bias
Property Law Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Easements Trespass Harassment Data Protection Nuisance +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cam Askan

Claimant/applicant

Trustees of St Asaph Conservative Club

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Oral Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Ownership of contested land
  2. 2 Adverse possession by unincorporated association
  3. 3 Validity of Land Registry registration

Ratio Decidendi

The Club holds registered title and/or adverse possession over the contested land; the Club has a prescriptive easement over the path; Applicant's claims for harassment, nuisance, and breach of Data Protection Act fail due to lack of ownership and reasonable conduct by the Club; allegations of bias and procedural irregularity are unfounded.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Renewed application for permission to appeal denied.
  • Application to rely upon Amended Grounds of Appeal dismissed as abusive.