J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd & Anor v Graham & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 117 (6 February 2001)

The court found no sufficient grounds to grant permission to appeal, as the law was settled and properly applied to the facts of the case.

Citation: [2001] EWCA Civ 117
Parties: Claimants/appellants: J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANR; Defendants/respondents: CAROLINE GRAHAM & ANR
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 06 February 2001
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to House of Lords
Outcome: Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics: Adverse Possession, Grazing Licence, Intention to Possess

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANR

Claimants/appellants

CAROLINE GRAHAM & ANR

Defendants/respondents

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to House of Lords

1 Whether permission to appeal to the House of Lords should be granted in a case involving adverse possession and a large area of land
2 Whether the mental element of intention to possess and the effect of a grazing licence warrant further consideration

The court found no sufficient grounds to grant permission to appeal, as the law was settled and properly applied to the facts of the case.

Application for permission to appeal refused