Barratt Developments Plc v City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council & Anor [2009] EWHC 3208 (Admin) (10 December 2009)
The court held that Wakefield's Core Strategy Policy CS6 was not outside the appropriate power. The policy, as amended and adopted, set a target for affordable housing that was supported by a robust and credible evidence base, allowed for flexibility through negotiation on a site-by-site basis, and was justified in light of national and regional policy requirements. The Inspector's conclusions were rational and supported by the evidence, and the policy was not rendered unlawful by the absence of explicit trigger points or by the economic conditions prevailing at the time of adoption.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 3208 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Barratt Developments PLC; First Defendant: City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Affordable Housing Policy, Core Strategy Adoption, Economic Viability Assessment, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barratt Developments PLC
Claimant
City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wakefield's Core Strategy Policy CS6 on affordable housing was outside the appropriate power under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 due to failure to conform with statutory requirements and national policy.
- 2 Whether the policy was justified, based on robust and credible evidence, and sufficiently flexible to account for economic conditions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Wakefield's Core Strategy Policy CS6 was not outside the appropriate power. The policy, as amended and adopted, set a target for affordable housing that was supported by a robust and credible evidence base, allowed for flexibility through negotiation on a site-by-site basis, and was justified in light of national and regional policy requirements. The Inspector's conclusions were rational and supported by the evidence, and the policy was not rendered unlawful by the absence of explicit trigger points or by the economic conditions prevailing at the time of adoption.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is refused.
- Policy CS6 of Wakefield's Core Strategy is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment