Turner & Co (GB) Ltd v Abi [2010] EWHC 2078 (QB) (08 June 2010)
Mr Abi personally entered into the agreement as seller; he was acting for business purposes, so the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 do not apply; the share transfers constituted a 'transaction' under the agreement, triggering Turner's entitlement to the minimum commission.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2078
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Turner & Co (GB) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Fatah Abi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contractual Dispute) / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant (Turner & Co (GB) Ltd)
- Legal Topics
- Agency, Commission Agreements, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts, Interpretation of Commercial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Turner & Co (GB) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Fatah Abi
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contractual Dispute) / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Abi personally entered into a binding agreement with Turner & Co (GB) Ltd as seller.
- 2 Whether the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 apply to the agreement and, if so, whether the terms are unfair.
- 3 Whether the share transfers constituted a 'transaction' under the agreement, triggering commission liability.
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Abi personally entered into the agreement as seller; he was acting for business purposes, so the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 do not apply; the share transfers constituted a 'transaction' under the agreement, triggering Turner's entitlement to the minimum commission.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant (Turner & Co (GB) Ltd)
Orders
- Defendant to pay £10,000 plus VAT to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment