Cosco Container Lines Company Ltd v Batchford (t/a County Contractors) & Anor [2013] EWHC 840 (QB) (24 April 2013)

Cosco Container Lines Company Ltd v Batchford (t/a County Contractors) & Anor [2013] EWHC 840 (QB) (24 April 2013)

The court found that Mr. Scheller acted as agent for Mr. Batchford in entering into the contracts of carriage with Cosco. The documentary evidence, including bills of lading, customs documents, and Mr. Batchford's own actions in similar transactions with other shipping lines, established that Mr. Batchford was the principal and liable for the charges. The court rejected Mr. Batchford's inconsistent explanations and found he was not merely a loader but the shipper under the contracts.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 840
Parties
Claimant: Cosco Container Lines Company Limited; First Defendant: Robert John Batchford (trading as County Contractors); Second Defendant: Gunter Scheller (trading as Kent International Freight Services UK Ltd.)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Commercial Shipping Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant against the first defendant.
Legal Topics
Agency, Bills of Lading, Freight and Demurrage, Misrepresentation, Personal Liability of Agents
Commercial Law Shipping Law Contract Law Agency Bills of Lading Freight and Demurrage Misrepresentation Personal Liability of Agents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cosco Container Lines Company Limited

Claimant

Robert John Batchford (trading as County Contractors)

First Defendant

Gunter Scheller (trading as Kent International Freight Services UK Ltd.)

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Shipping Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Batchford was liable as principal under contracts of carriage for shipping charges and demurrage incurred by Cosco.
  2. 2 Whether Mr. Scheller acted as agent for Mr. Batchford or on his own behalf.
  3. 3 Whether the bills of lading and related documents established Mr. Batchford as shipper and liable party.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr. Scheller acted as agent for Mr. Batchford in entering into the contracts of carriage with Cosco. The documentary evidence, including bills of lading, customs documents, and Mr. Batchford's own actions in similar transactions with other shipping lines, established that Mr. Batchford was the principal and liable for the charges. The court rejected Mr. Batchford's inconsistent explanations and found he was not merely a loader but the shipper under the contracts.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant against the first defendant.

Orders

  • Mr. Batchford is liable to pay Cosco the sum claimed for shipping charges and demurrage.
  • Judgment previously entered against the second defendant for breach of an unless order.