Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [2009] EWCA Civ 1311 (08 December 2009)

Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [2009] EWCA Civ 1311 (08 December 2009)

Entering into a Virtual Assignment, as structured in this case, does not amount to parting with or sharing possession, declaring a trust, assigning, or underletting the premises in breach of the lease's alienation covenants. The arrangement is contractual, does not transfer proprietary rights or occupation, and does not breach the lease terms as alleged.

Citation
[2009] EWCA Civ 1311
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Clarence House Limited; Defendant/appellant: National Westminster Bank Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Judgment below set aside. Claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Alienation Covenants, Virtual Assignment, Leasehold, Declaration of Trust, Assignment of Lease, Underletting
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Law Alienation Covenants Virtual Assignment Leasehold Declaration of Trust Assignment of Lease Underletting

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clarence House Limited

Claimant/respondent

National Westminster Bank Plc

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether entering into a Virtual Assignment breaches alienation covenants in a lease, specifically by parting with or sharing possession, declaring a trust, assigning, or underletting without landlord's consent.

Ratio Decidendi

Entering into a Virtual Assignment, as structured in this case, does not amount to parting with or sharing possession, declaring a trust, assigning, or underletting the premises in breach of the lease's alienation covenants. The arrangement is contractual, does not transfer proprietary rights or occupation, and does not breach the lease terms as alleged.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Judgment below set aside. Claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Set aside the order of HHJ Hodge Q.C.
  • Dismiss the claim of Clarence House Limited.