Lancashire Schools SPC Phase 2 Ltd v Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 37 (TCC) (12 January 2024)
Clause 68 of the Project Agreement, read with clause 86, makes adjudication a mandatory condition precedent to litigation. However, in the exercise of the court's discretion under CPR Part 11, a stay or strike out is refused because the dispute is complex, multi-party, and contingent, making adjudication impractical and likely to cause delay and prejudice to the efficient resolution of the proceedings. The balance of justice and case management considerations favour allowing the litigation to proceed.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 37 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Lancashire Schools SPC Phase 2 Limited (formerly Catalyst Education (Lancashire) Phase 2 Limited); First Defendant: Lendlease Construction (Europe) Limited (formerly Bovis Lend Lease Limited); Second Defendant: Lendlease Construction Holdings (Europe) Limited (formerly Bovis Lend Lease Holdings Limited); Third Defendant: Equans Buildings Limited (formerly Vita Lend Lease Limited); Fourth Defendant/applicant: Lancashire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Technology and Construction Court Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Service or Strike Out Claim Against Fourth Defendant
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (adr), Jurisdiction, Adjudication Clauses, Stay of Proceedings, Condition Precedent, Interpretation of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lancashire Schools SPC Phase 2 Limited (formerly Catalyst Education (Lancashire) Phase 2 Limited)
Claimant/respondent
Lendlease Construction (Europe) Limited (formerly Bovis Lend Lease Limited)
First Defendant
Lendlease Construction Holdings (Europe) Limited (formerly Bovis Lend Lease Holdings Limited)
Second Defendant
Equans Buildings Limited (formerly Vita Lend Lease Limited)
Third Defendant
Lancashire County Council
Fourth Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Application in Technology and Construction Court Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Service or Strike Out Claim Against Fourth Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 68 of the Project Agreement makes adjudication a condition precedent to litigation
- 2 Whether the court should stay or strike out proceedings for failure to adjudicate first
- 3 Proper construction of dispute resolution and jurisdiction clauses in PFI contracts
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 68 of the Project Agreement, read with clause 86, makes adjudication a mandatory condition precedent to litigation. However, in the exercise of the court's discretion under CPR Part 11, a stay or strike out is refused because the dispute is complex, multi-party, and contingent, making adjudication impractical and likely to cause delay and prejudice to the efficient resolution of the proceedings. The balance of justice and case management considerations favour allowing the litigation to proceed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application by the Fourth Defendant to set aside service or strike out the claim is refused.
- The proceedings against the Fourth Defendant are not stayed or struck out and may proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment