Hall & Ors v Motor Sport Vision Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1873 (6 December, 2001)

Hall & Ors v Motor Sport Vision Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1873 (6 December, 2001)

Permission to appeal is granted, limited to whether the judge should have allowed amendment of the pleadings to include new complaints regarding engineering and preparation defects (lifeing and crack-testing), as these are distinct from race day set-up issues and may not have been discoverable by the claimants earlier.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 1873
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Charles Hall; Claimant/appellant: Apex Racing Limited; Claimant/appellant: William Edward Hall; Defendant/respondent: Motor Sport Vision Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted (limited)
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Adduction of New Evidence, Motor Racing Contracts, Engineering Negligence
Civil Procedure Contract Law Amendment of Pleadings Adduction of New Evidence Motor Racing Contracts Engineering Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Hall

Claimant/appellant

Apex Racing Limited

Claimant/appellant

William Edward Hall

Claimant/appellant

Motor Sport Vision Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend pleadings to include new allegations based on late evidence regarding engineering and preparation defects
  2. 2 Whether the claimants could have discovered the alleged defects earlier with reasonable diligence

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted, limited to whether the judge should have allowed amendment of the pleadings to include new complaints regarding engineering and preparation defects (lifeing and crack-testing), as these are distinct from race day set-up issues and may not have been discoverable by the claimants earlier.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted (limited)

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted limited to the point contained in paragraph 15 of Mr Angeloni's affidavit.
  • Directions given for filing revised pleadings, evidence, and skeleton arguments within 14 days.