Patel v National Westminster Bank Plc [2015] EWCA Civ 332 (01 April 2015)
The proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were unsustainable as there was no real prospect of success based on the available evidence; even if arguable, the court would not exercise discretion to allow late amendments due to delay and weakness of the new case.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 332
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Jignesh Patel; Defendant/respondent: National Westminster Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Amend Particulars of Claim; Appeal Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Summary Judgment, Breach of Duty, Lost Cheque, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jignesh Patel
Claimant/appellant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Amend Particulars of Claim; Appeal Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend particulars of claim to plead that the cheque would have been honoured
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments had a real prospect of success
- 3 Whether the court should exercise discretion to allow late amendments
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were unsustainable as there was no real prospect of success based on the available evidence; even if arguable, the court would not exercise discretion to allow late amendments due to delay and weakness of the new case.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to amend particulars of claim refused
- Judgment for NatWest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment