Advinia Care Homes Ltd v BUPA Care Homes Investments (Holdings) Ltd & Ors
Permission to withdraw the admission regarding novation is refused due to lateness, absence of new evidence, and lack of substantial prejudice to applicant; amendments relating to negligent misstatement and unjust enrichment are allowed as they do not materially prejudice Defendants or imperil the trial date; trial adjournment is not necessary.
- Parties
- Claimant: Advinia Care Homes Limited; First Defendant: Bupa Care Homes Investments (Holdings) Limited; Second Defendant: Bupa Care Homes (CFHCARE) Limited; Third Defendant: Bupa Care Homes (ANS) Limited; Fourth Defendant: Bupa Care Homes (CARRICK) Limited; Fifth Defendant: Bupa Finance PLC; Third Party: Advinia Health Care Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings, Withdraw Admission, and Adjourn Trial
- Outcome
- Application to withdraw admission and amend pleadings regarding succession issue dismissed; permission granted for amendments relating to negligent misstatement, unjust enrichment, and certain factual clarifications; trial adjournment not granted.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Withdrawal of Admission, Negligent Misstatement, Unjust Enrichment, Trust Money, Breach of Warranty, Misrepresentation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Advinia Care Homes Limited
Claimant
Bupa Care Homes Investments (Holdings) Limited
First Defendant
Bupa Care Homes (CFHCARE) Limited
Second Defendant
Bupa Care Homes (ANS) Limited
Third Defendant
Bupa Care Homes (CARRICK) Limited
Fourth Defendant
Bupa Finance PLC
Fifth Defendant
Advinia Health Care Limited
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings, Withdraw Admission, and Adjourn Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend pleadings
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to withdraw an admission regarding novation
- 3 Whether amendments relating to negligent misstatement and unjust enrichment should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to withdraw the admission regarding novation is refused due to lateness, absence of new evidence, and lack of substantial prejudice to applicant; amendments relating to negligent misstatement and unjust enrichment are allowed as they do not materially prejudice Defendants or imperil the trial date; trial adjournment is not necessary.
Court Disposition
Application to withdraw admission and amend pleadings regarding succession issue dismissed; permission granted for amendments relating to negligent misstatement, unjust enrichment, and certain factual clarifications; trial adjournment not granted.
Orders
- Permission to amend Particulars of Claim and Amended Defence and Counterclaim granted in respect of negligent misstatement, unjust enrichment, and factual clarifications.
- Permission to withdraw admission regarding novation refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment