Flavio de Carvalho Pinto Viegas & Ors v The Estate of José Luis Cutrale & Anor
The court refused to disallow the amendments to add claimants on limitation grounds because the defendants' limitation defence was not prejudiced by relation back; claims brought by deceased persons are nullities and cannot be cured by substitution; English grants of representation are required for claims brought as representatives or by heirs prior to distribution; heirs have concurrent standing under Brazilian law but act for the benefit of the estate, not as absolute owners; assignments and powers of attorney by heirs are valid if formalities are met and all heirs consent.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Flavio de Carvalho Pinto Viegas and 1,516 others; Claimant/respondent: Mr José Antonio Ruiz Sanches and 30 others; Defendant/applicant: The Estate of Mr José Luis Cutrale (represented by Mrs Rosana Falcioni Cutrale); Defendant/applicant: Mr José Luis Cutrale (Jnr)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial (competition/cartel) / Ruling on Strike Out and Amendment Applications (pre Trial Interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Defendants' applications largely dismissed; some claims struck out as nullities; amendments allowed; relief from sanctions refused.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Standing of Claimants, Succession and Administration of Estates, Authority to Act/consent, Assignment of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Flavio de Carvalho Pinto Viegas and 1,516 others
Claimant/respondent
Mr José Antonio Ruiz Sanches and 30 others
Claimant/respondent
The Estate of Mr José Luis Cutrale (represented by Mrs Rosana Falcioni Cutrale)
Defendant/applicant
Mr José Luis Cutrale (Jnr)
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial (competition/cartel) / Ruling on Strike Out and Amendment Applications (pre Trial Interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendments to add claimants should be disallowed for limitation under CPR 17.2(1)
- 2 Whether claims brought by deceased persons are nullities and can be cured by substitution
- 3 Whether English grants of representation are required for claims by representatives or heirs under Brazilian law
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to disallow the amendments to add claimants on limitation grounds because the defendants' limitation defence was not prejudiced by relation back; claims brought by deceased persons are nullities and cannot be cured by substitution; English grants of representation are required for claims brought as representatives or by heirs prior to distribution; heirs have concurrent standing under Brazilian law but act for the benefit of the estate, not as absolute owners; assignments and powers of attorney by heirs are valid if formalities are met and all heirs consent.
Court Disposition
Defendants' applications largely dismissed; some claims struck out as nullities; amendments allowed; relief from sanctions refused.
Orders
- Amendments to add claimants to the Viegas Claim on 22 November 2019 and 23 January 2020 are allowed; strike out application on limitation grounds refused.
- Relief from sanctions for late application under CPR 17.2 refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment