In Media Trust SPA (A company incorporated under the laws of Italy) as Trustee for the Jacaranda Trust v BGB Weston Limited & Ors
The court held that the claimant should be permitted to amend the particulars of claim to advance new claims in contract and conspiracy, as the claims have real prospects of success and are not barred by limitation due to the operation of section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980, given the deliberate concealment and fraud by the defendants (specifically Mr Pinto as agent of BGB). The court found that the claimant and its trustee could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered the relevant facts more than six years before the application. Although the claimant (through its former trustee) committed a serious abuse of process by making knowingly false statements regarding the date of the...
- Parties
- Claimant: In Media Trust SPA as Trustee for the Jacaranda Trust; First Defendant: BGB Weston Limited; Second Defendant: Lorenzo Gallucci; Third Defendant: Gennaro Pinto
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/trust) / Ruling on Applications to Amend Particulars of Claim, Strike Out, and Reverse Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to amend particulars of claim allowed; application to strike out or for reverse summary judgment dismissed; costs sanction imposed for abuse of process.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Abuse of Process, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Worldwide Freezing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
In Media Trust SPA as Trustee for the Jacaranda Trust
Claimant
BGB Weston Limited
First Defendant
Lorenzo Gallucci
Second Defendant
Gennaro Pinto
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/trust) / Ruling on Applications to Amend Particulars of Claim, Strike Out, and Reverse Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be permitted to amend the particulars of claim to advance new claims in contract and conspiracy
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments are barred by limitation and if section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 applies
- 3 Whether the claim or proceedings should be struck out for abuse of process due to false statements regarding the date of the investment management agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the claimant should be permitted to amend the particulars of claim to advance new claims in contract and conspiracy, as the claims have real prospects of success and are not barred by limitation due to the operation of section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980, given the deliberate concealment and fraud by the defendants (specifically Mr Pinto as agent of BGB). The court found that the claimant and its trustee could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered the relevant facts more than six years before the application. Although the claimant (through its former trustee) committed a serious abuse of process by making knowingly false statements regarding the date of the...
Court Disposition
Application to amend particulars of claim allowed; application to strike out or for reverse summary judgment dismissed; costs sanction imposed for abuse of process.
Orders
- Permission granted to claimant to amend particulars of claim as set out, subject to conditions regarding scope of claims and no further amendments to introduce lesser claims.
- Application by defendants to strike out or for reverse summary judgment dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment