Stanton v Stanton & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 343 (25 February 2002)
Permission to appeal is granted to consider whether the county court judge erred in treating the matter as an application for permission to appeal rather than a full appeal, and whether the district judge's order can be challenged on the basis of Reginald Stanton's occupation status.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 343
- Parties
- Claimant (respondent): Carol Joan Stanton; Defendant (applicant): Philip George Stanton; First Intervenor: Reginald George Stanton; Second Intervenor: Vivianka Margareta Todd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Enforcement of Consent Orders, Appeals Procedure, Occupation of Matrimonial Home
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carol Joan Stanton
Claimant (respondent)
Philip George Stanton
Defendant (applicant)
Reginald George Stanton
First Intervenor
Vivianka Margareta Todd
Second Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in treating the application as one for permission to appeal rather than a full appeal
- 2 Whether the district judge's order can be upset on the basis that Reginald Stanton remained in occupation within the meaning of the consent order
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted to consider whether the county court judge erred in treating the matter as an application for permission to appeal rather than a full appeal, and whether the district judge's order can be challenged on the basis of Reginald Stanton's occupation status.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Matter to be listed before a two-judge constitution including at least one Lord Justice familiar with family work
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment