Shah v Shah [2002] EWCA Civ 1312 (29 July 2002)

Shah v Shah [2002] EWCA Civ 1312 (29 July 2002)

There was no manifest error, misdirection of law, or compelling reason to interfere with the District Judge's orders. The applications for permission to appeal were hopeless and must be dismissed.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1312
Parties
Petitioner/respondent: Iftaw Hussain Shah; Respondent/applicant: Ambreen Shah
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal (ancillary Relief Proceedings) / Application for Permission to Appeal Orders From Bow County Court
Outcome
Applications for permission to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Appeals, Judicial Discretion, Mental Health in Litigation
Family Law Civil Procedure Ancillary Relief Appeals Judicial Discretion Mental Health in Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iftaw Hussain Shah

Petitioner/respondent

Ambreen Shah

Respondent/applicant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (ancillary Relief Proceedings) / Application for Permission to Appeal Orders From Bow County Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the orders of the Bow County Court, including refusal to transfer proceedings and grant of decree absolute, were properly made
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should have been determined in the absence of the appellant
  3. 3 Whether there was any manifest error or misdirection of law justifying appellate intervention

Ratio Decidendi

There was no manifest error, misdirection of law, or compelling reason to interfere with the District Judge's orders. The applications for permission to appeal were hopeless and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Applications for permission to appeal refused.

Orders

  • All applications for permission to appeal are dismissed.