Wall v Wall [2002] EWCA Civ 1897 (27 November 2002)

Wall v Wall [2002] EWCA Civ 1897 (27 November 2002)

There was no error of law, procedural irregularity, or unfairness in the lower courts' decisions; the circuit judge was justified in dismissing the appeal, and the case did not meet the threshold for a second appeal under CPR Part 52.13.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1897
Parties
Respondent/applicant: Julie Mary Pritchard Wall; Petitioner/respondent: John Frederick Wall
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Appeals Procedure, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julie Mary Pritchard Wall

Respondent/applicant

John Frederick Wall

Petitioner/respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the lower courts erred in the division of matrimonial assets
  2. 2 Whether there was procedural impropriety or unfairness in the lower courts
  3. 3 Whether the circuit judge erred in refusing an adjournment for legal representation

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error of law, procedural irregularity, or unfairness in the lower courts' decisions; the circuit judge was justified in dismissing the appeal, and the case did not meet the threshold for a second appeal under CPR Part 52.13.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal refused.
  • Application for discovery dismissed.