Wall v Wall [2002] EWCA Civ 1897 (27 November 2002)
There was no error of law, procedural irregularity, or unfairness in the lower courts' decisions; the circuit judge was justified in dismissing the appeal, and the case did not meet the threshold for a second appeal under CPR Part 52.13.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1897
- Parties
- Respondent/applicant: Julie Mary Pritchard Wall; Petitioner/respondent: John Frederick Wall
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Appeals Procedure, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie Mary Pritchard Wall
Respondent/applicant
John Frederick Wall
Petitioner/respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower courts erred in the division of matrimonial assets
- 2 Whether there was procedural impropriety or unfairness in the lower courts
- 3 Whether the circuit judge erred in refusing an adjournment for legal representation
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law, procedural irregularity, or unfairness in the lower courts' decisions; the circuit judge was justified in dismissing the appeal, and the case did not meet the threshold for a second appeal under CPR Part 52.13.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused.
- Application for discovery dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment