Tuckett v Tuckett [2007] EWCA Civ 113 (30 January 2007)

Tuckett v Tuckett [2007] EWCA Civ 113 (30 January 2007)

There was no error in the lower courts' approach to asset valuation, case management, or consideration of the husband's mental health. No important point of law or practice arises, and there is no other compelling reason to grant permission for a second appeal or to admit fresh evidence.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Civ 113
Parties
Petitioner/respondent: Jane Maria deCourcy Tuckett; Respondent/applicant: William Roger Quentin Tuckett
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Ancillary Relief (family) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Outcome
Applications refused
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Appeals, Valuation of Assets, Case Management, Extension of Time, Admission of Fresh Evidence, Human Rights Fair Hearing
Family Law Ancillary Relief Appeals Valuation of Assets Case Management Extension of Time Admission of Fresh Evidence Human Rights Fair Hearing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Maria deCourcy Tuckett

Petitioner/respondent

William Roger Quentin Tuckett

Respondent/applicant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Ancillary Relief (family) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (civil Division)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lower courts erred in the valuation of the wife's minority shareholding and other assets
  2. 2 Whether the husband was unfairly denied the opportunity to adduce expert evidence
  3. 3 Whether the lower courts failed to adequately consider the husband's mental health

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error in the lower courts' approach to asset valuation, case management, or consideration of the husband's mental health. No important point of law or practice arises, and there is no other compelling reason to grant permission for a second appeal or to admit fresh evidence.

Court Disposition

Applications refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Extension of time refused