K v L

K v L

The sharing principle does not require equal division of non-matrimonial property. The judge was correct to limit the award to the husband's needs, as the assets were entirely non-matrimonial, derived from the wife's inheritance, and there was no legal basis for a greater award by reference to the sharing principle. The judge's approach was not discriminatory and was consistent with established legal principles.

Parties
Appellant (husband): K; Respondent (wife): L
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal (ancillary Relief/financial Remedy) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Non Matrimonial Property, Sharing Principle, Financial Provision, Clean Break, Needs Principle
Family Law Ancillary Relief Non Matrimonial Property Sharing Principle Financial Provision Clean Break Needs Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K

Appellant (husband)

L

Respondent (wife)

Procedural Posture

Appeal (ancillary Relief/financial Remedy) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sharing principle applies to non-matrimonial property in ancillary relief following divorce
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in limiting the award to the husband's needs rather than applying the sharing principle
  3. 3 Whether the source of assets loses significance over a long marriage

Ratio Decidendi

The sharing principle does not require equal division of non-matrimonial property. The judge was correct to limit the award to the husband's needs, as the assets were entirely non-matrimonial, derived from the wife's inheritance, and there was no legal basis for a greater award by reference to the sharing principle. The judge's approach was not discriminatory and was consistent with established legal principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The lump sum award of £5 million to the husband stands.
  • Reporting restrictions and anonymisation order to protect the children.