AB v CB
The farmhouse trust is a nuptial settlement within the meaning of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s.24(1)(c), as it was established to provide a home for the husband and wife. The court has power to vary the whole trust, not just the right to occupy, due to the trustees' power to advance the property absolutely. The wife is entitled to recover her direct contributions outright and to a life interest in half the net value of the farmhouse, reflecting the sharing principle and her needs, while respecting the trust's purpose to retain the property for the estate. The appeal grounds lacked merit as the court properly considered the needs of all parties and beneficiaries.
- Parties
- Applicant/wife: AB; First Respondent/husband: CB; Second Respondent/interveners: Trustees of the X Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Judgment and Subsequent Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed; original financial orders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Financial Remedy, Nuptial Settlement, Variation of Trusts, Matrimonial Property, Needs Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Applicant/wife
CB
First Respondent/husband
Trustees of the X Trust
Second Respondent/interveners
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Judgment and Subsequent Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the farmhouse trust is a nuptial settlement subject to variation under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s.24(1)(c)
- 2 Extent of the wife's entitlement to the trust property and other assets upon divorce
- 3 Appropriate variation of the trust to achieve fairness between the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The farmhouse trust is a nuptial settlement within the meaning of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 s.24(1)(c), as it was established to provide a home for the husband and wife. The court has power to vary the whole trust, not just the right to occupy, due to the trustees' power to advance the property absolutely. The wife is entitled to recover her direct contributions outright and to a life interest in half the net value of the farmhouse, reflecting the sharing principle and her needs, while respecting the trust's purpose to retain the property for the estate. The appeal grounds lacked merit as the court properly considered the needs of all parties and beneficiaries.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed; original financial orders affirmed.
Orders
- Trust varied to provide the wife £23,000 outright and £134,000 as a life tenancy from the trust fund, reverting to the estate on her death.
- Husband to pay wife £7,500 as a lump sum in respect of her share of a loan to the enterprise company, with the wife transferring her interest in the debt to the husband.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment