Sealy v Sealy [2005] EWCA Civ 1665 (14 October 2005)
The proper course for challenging orders allegedly obtained by material non-disclosure is to apply to set aside those orders at first instance, not to pursue the appellate route. The appellate court cannot determine factual issues of non-disclosure and the matter should be heard on evidence before the original court.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1665
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Joanna Elizabeth Sealy; Defendant/appellant: Richard Sealy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (ancillary Relief/family) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission granted to withdraw application for permission to appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Non Disclosure, Setting Aside Orders, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joanna Elizabeth Sealy
Claimant/respondent
Richard Sealy
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (ancillary Relief/family) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellate route is appropriate for challenging orders allegedly obtained by material non-disclosure
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to adduce fresh evidence on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The proper course for challenging orders allegedly obtained by material non-disclosure is to apply to set aside those orders at first instance, not to pursue the appellate route. The appellate court cannot determine factual issues of non-disclosure and the matter should be heard on evidence before the original court.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to withdraw application for permission to appeal.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal withdrawn by leave of the court.
- Matter to be reconsidered at first instance by application to set aside previous orders on grounds of non-disclosure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment