Charman v Charman [2006] EWHC 1879 (Fam) (27 July 2006)
The assets held in the Dragon Holdings Trust are a resource available to the husband and must be included in the matrimonial assets for division. The husband's claim of a dynastic trust intention is unsupported by evidence and documentation. The husband's special contribution does not justify a significant departure from equality, and the wife's conduct does not meet the threshold for consideration under s.25(2)(g). The appropriate division is 45% to the wife and 55% to the husband, reflecting the husband's special contribution but not excluding trust assets.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 1879 (Fam)
- Parties
- Petitioner/wife: Beverley Anne Charman; Respondent/husband: John Robert Charman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy Proceedings (ancillary Relief) Following Divorce / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; wife awarded 45% of total assets including Dragon Holdings Trust.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Financial Provision, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Trust Assets in Divorce, Special Contribution, Conduct in Financial Remedy Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beverley Anne Charman
Petitioner/wife
John Robert Charman
Respondent/husband
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Proceedings (ancillary Relief) Following Divorce / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assets held in the Dragon Holdings Trust should be included as matrimonial assets for division
- 2 Whether the husband's 'special/stellar contribution' justifies departure from equality
- 3 Whether the wife's alleged lack of support and refusal to move to Bermuda amount to conduct affecting the award
Ratio Decidendi
The assets held in the Dragon Holdings Trust are a resource available to the husband and must be included in the matrimonial assets for division. The husband's claim of a dynastic trust intention is unsupported by evidence and documentation. The husband's special contribution does not justify a significant departure from equality, and the wife's conduct does not meet the threshold for consideration under s.25(2)(g). The appropriate division is 45% to the wife and 55% to the husband, reflecting the husband's special contribution but not excluding trust assets.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; wife awarded 45% of total assets including Dragon Holdings Trust.
Orders
- Wife to receive capital provision to bring her total assets to £48 million (rounded from £48,000,000), representing 45% of the total matrimonial assets including those in the Dragon Holdings Trust.
- Mechanism to be provided for the husband to recoup a portion of actual UK tax paid on Axis interests if further liability arises and is paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment