Veli Tum, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 788 (24 May 2004)
The Secretary of State erred in applying the current Immigration Rules rather than those in force on 1 January 1973 when considering the respondents' applications to establish a business under the Ankara Agreement. The standstill clause applies to Turkish nationals regardless of their entry status, unless entry was obtained by fraud. The appeal is dismissed and the High Court's decision is upheld.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 788
- Parties
- First Respondent/claimant: Veli Tum; Second Respondent/claimant: Mehmet Dari; Appellant/defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ankara Agreement, Additional Protocol Article 41(1), Dublin Convention, Immigration Rules, Standstill Clause, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Veli Tum
First Respondent/claimant
Mehmet Dari
Second Respondent/claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Turkish asylum seekers can rely on the 'standstill' provision of Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement when seeking to establish a business in the UK
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State was required to apply the 1973 Immigration Rules rather than the current rules when considering such applications
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State erred in applying the current Immigration Rules rather than those in force on 1 January 1973 when considering the respondents' applications to establish a business under the Ankara Agreement. The standstill clause applies to Turkish nationals regardless of their entry status, unless entry was obtained by fraud. The appeal is dismissed and the High Court's decision is upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment