Leeds City Council v Fawcett [2008] EWCA Civ 597 (02 May 2008)
The Recorder correctly applied the statutory test of necessity and proportionality, considering all relevant factors, and was entitled to conclude that the exclusion zone (including Miss Nelson's home) was necessary to protect neighbours from further antisocial acts by Mr Fawcett. No error of law or principle was found.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 597
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Leeds City Council; Appellant/defendant: David Fawcett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Judgment on Appeal From Leeds County Court Regarding ASBO Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Anti Social Behaviour Orders (asbo), Proportionality, Necessity, Exclusion Zones, Article 8 ECHR, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leeds City Council
Respondent/claimant
David Fawcett
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Judgment on Appeal From Leeds County Court Regarding ASBO Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ASBO exclusion zone imposed on Mr Fawcett was necessary and proportionate under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the Recorder erred in refusing to allow Mr Fawcett access to Miss Nelson's home within the exclusion zone
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder correctly applied the statutory test of necessity and proportionality, considering all relevant factors, and was entitled to conclude that the exclusion zone (including Miss Nelson's home) was necessary to protect neighbours from further antisocial acts by Mr Fawcett. No error of law or principle was found.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ASBO exclusion zone to be amended by consent to exclude certain areas (school, former employment) and to include a general prohibition on harassment as intended by the Recorder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment