Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd & Anor v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Ors
The anti-deprivation rule does not invalidate the contractual 'flip' provisions or the linked share acquisition and licence termination clauses, as they do not remove property from the insolvent estate contrary to the statutory insolvency regime, but rather regulate priorities or rights as part of the original bargain, and/or were triggered before insolvency. The rule is confined to preventing the removal of assets from the estate upon insolvency, not to regulating the economic effect of valid contractual arrangements.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited; Respondent/claimant: Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited; Appellant/defendant: BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited; Appellant/defendant: Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; Joint Administrator: Daniel Francis Butters; Joint Administrator: Neville Barry Kahn; Joint Administrator: Nicholas James Dargan; Appellant/defendant/respondent: BBC Worldwide Limited; Claimant/appellant/defendant/respondent: 2 Entertain Limited; Claimant/appellant/defendant/respondent: BBC Video Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals by LBSF and the administrators dismissed; cross-appeal by BBC Worldwide Limited allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Deprivation Rule, Insolvency Proceedings, Contractual Priorities, Liquidation, Administration, Shareholder Agreements, Licensing Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
Respondent/claimant
Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited
Respondent/claimant
BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited
Appellant/defendant
Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc
Appellant/defendant
Daniel Francis Butters
Joint Administrator
Neville Barry Kahn
Joint Administrator
Nicholas James Dargan
Joint Administrator
BBC Worldwide Limited
Appellant/defendant/respondent
2 Entertain Limited
Claimant/appellant/defendant/respondent
BBC Video Limited
Claimant/appellant/defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the anti-deprivation rule invalidate contractual provisions that alter priorities or rights upon insolvency?
- 2 Does the timing of the deprivation (before or after insolvency) affect the rule's application?
- 3 Do linked provisions in joint venture and licence agreements offend the anti-deprivation rule?
Ratio Decidendi
The anti-deprivation rule does not invalidate the contractual 'flip' provisions or the linked share acquisition and licence termination clauses, as they do not remove property from the insolvent estate contrary to the statutory insolvency regime, but rather regulate priorities or rights as part of the original bargain, and/or were triggered before insolvency. The rule is confined to preventing the removal of assets from the estate upon insolvency, not to regulating the economic effect of valid contractual arrangements.
Court Disposition
Appeals by LBSF and the administrators dismissed; cross-appeal by BBC Worldwide Limited allowed.
Orders
- LBSF's appeal against the Chancellor's decision is dismissed.
- Administrators' appeals against Peter Smith J's decision are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment